US v. Assange – Manning charged docs compared to those cited in the Assange superseding indictment in re foreign intel sources & cooperative Afghani and Iraqis
I plan to write about U.S. v. Assange and related WikiLeaks espionage cases, so here is my disclaimer.
I wanted to put this statement up on my blog, because I intend to write more about the U.S. prosecution of Julian Assange and related WikiLeaks espionage cases. I haven’t written about the subject regularly for public consumption, despite being an expert, by choice. Since I am a subject matter expert on the Chelsea Manning court-martial record and the U.S. investigation into civilians involved in the 2010 breach, however, I…
Breakdown of currently known forensic and circumstantial evidence related to Count 18 against Julian Assange, Conspiracy To Commit Computer Intrusion (18 U.S.C. 371 and 1030)
Previously unknown search warrants and electronic comm orders tied to WikiLeaks criminal investigation.
Manning was born and grew up in an age of information. Her leaks are proportional to it, even if they understandably shocked the institutions and society with their advent. Her guilelessness evokes the kind of earnest protagonist in a classic fictional war story. Like in Thin Red Line or Catch 22 Manning was a humanist soldier trapped by cynical realities of warfare and her own incapacity to deaden her senses and willful and disobedient conscience clinging onto the exigent hope that sanity and common sense would triumph if buttressed by knowledge and deliberation. Whether or not the reality of such an ideal is real or a fairy tale we tell ourselves remains to be seen. An act of mercy by the Executive, might evidence its virtuous display in our great and fallible experiment in self government.